Reports of Barrier Reef's death exaggerated
Hot on the heels of the "frogs not being killed off by climate change" debacle (see here), The Australian reports that the barrier reef has the ability to adapt to changes in climate. Why this comes as a shock to anyone is beyond me, given that parts of the reef are millions of years old and would have gone through multiple ice ages, multiple interglacials, multiple climate optima and goodness knows what else, yet it's still there.
How many other scare stories about the ecology and environment of the planet being damaged "by climate change" are equally misguided? There are two points here:
University of Queensland marine biologist Ove Hoegh-Guldberg said yesterday that sea temperatures were likely to rise 2C over the next three decades, which would undoubtedly kill the reef.
But several of Professor Hoegh-Guldberg's colleagues have taken issue with his prognosis.
Andrew Baird, principal research fellow at the Australian Research Council's Centre for Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, said there were "serious knowledge gaps" about the impact rising sea temperatures would have on coral.
"Ove is very dismissive of coral's ability to adapt, to respond in an evolutionary manner to climate change," Dr Baird said.
"I believe coral has an underappreciated capacity to evolve. It's one of the biological laws that, wherever you look, organisms have adapted to radical changes."
How many other scare stories about the ecology and environment of the planet being damaged "by climate change" are equally misguided? There are two points here:
- climate change happens, and has been happening since the dawn of time without any help from humans - get used to it;
- adaptation, not pointless "carbon reduction schemes", is the key - if coral can do it, so can we.
2 Comments:
The GBR is not "millions of years old". It has been growing roughly since the end of the last ice age, which means the current climatic period.
Before challenging prevailing scientific opinion with your own deeper and more incisive insights, it might help your credibility to check the basic "scientific" facts you cite.
Just out of curiosity, what is your special claim to expertise on this (or any other) scientific subject?
By Anonymous, At November 3, 2008 at 12:59 PM
The reef is approximately 600,000 years old, so my use of "millions" is technically incorrect. However, the point is still valid - there were many significant climate changes in that period, and the reef adapted.
As for my "incisive insights", a masters degree in a science discipline gives me more right to comment on such matters than most. In any case, this is a satirical blog, not a peer reviewed journal.
By Simon from Sydney, At November 3, 2008 at 1:37 PM
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated and may take some time to appear on the blog. Publication of a comment does not indicate endorsement or approval by Australian Climate Madness.
Please note that this blog is a humorous and satirical look at climate change propaganda in Australia and around the world. Please comment accordingly! Thanks.
<< Home